Kindle Paperwhite(2021 Release)
$109.99
Condition: Amazon Refurbished
Screen Size: 6.8"
Capacity: 32GB
Top positive review
1,007 people found this helpful
One of the best e-readers; beats print hands down
By Ivy Reisner on Reviewed in the United States on December 21, 2023
This isn't quite the top of the line for Kindles, but it's close. That honor would go to the Scribe, with the Oasis possibly taking second place, though we haven't seen a new Oasis in a while. It sports more memory than the regular Paperwhite, and I think that's particularly worth it if you're using Audible on the device. It would take a lot of text-based books to fill 8 gig never mind 16. I want to compare ereaders, then compare ebooks to print. If you are going to use this for audiobooks, it's hard to ignore the Nook from B&N as a competitor to this. The Glowlight 4 is about the same size as this and the 4 plus is a bit larger. All of these sport 32 gig of memory, are waterproof, and have about the same screen type. The advantage of the Nook is you get a 3.5mm headphone jack as well as being able to connect headphones via Bluetooth. The Kindle is limited to Bluetooth. The advantages of the Kindle are first that it supports Audible. If you have a subscription already, that becomes a no-brainer. If not, there are a lot of titles on Audible that B&N doesn't have. If those interest you, you're better off with the Kindle, and you'll want the larger memory. Second, transfering your own documents wirelessly to the device is substantially easier on Kindle. Just email it, or use the website, or send it to the app on your phone. Nook requires you use a USB cable and then find the right folder to put it in. This is a win for the Kindle, but any Kindle, not just Paperwhite Signature. Third, market dominance. The demise of Nook is often predicted (I don't think they're going anywhere, but that's merely my prediction based on market share over time) but no one in their right mind thinks Kindle, with a commanding 80+% market share at the time of this review, is going anywhere. For free books, Kindle has the monthly subscription to unlimited, Nook gives out a free books (or sometimes audiobook) every Friday. Prime subscribers can pick a free book (sometimes two) from a small selection at the beginning of the month. Overall, I'll call that a toss up. I use both, but if I could have only one, I'd go with the Kindle. If you're deciding between Kindles, the Oasis is smaller despite having a slightly larget screen and physical buttons (the bezel is much smaller) and it has cellular. The Paperwhite Signature has USB-C (not a big deal in my opinion) and wireless charging (and the stand they sell for that is absolutely amazing). The Paperwhite Signature is also substantially less expensive. The Scribe supports the pen and has built in notebooks, making it kind of a hybrid between the Supernote and the Kindle. That's the big win there. The win for the Paperwhite Signature is that it's waterproof, smaller, and less expensive. The basic Kindle is also worth looking at on a budget. It has less memory and isn't waterproof, but it's extremely affordable. This is the one I'd take with me into situations where I'd worry about it getting lost or damaged because it's the easiest to replace. This is also the one I'd give a kid, for the same reason, and also the one I'd suggest someone start on if they're not sure if they'll like ebooks. It really is a nice device. I use mine a lot. The Paperwhite regular sports less memory, but is a fine contender if you only want ebooks, no audio. You can only go up to 16 gig memory there, no wireless charging. It's front lit, but not automatically adjusting and it has ads. On the topic of ads, I've seen memes that seem to suggest they pop up while reading. While this model has no ads, if you're considering another don't let that stop you. They are on the sleep screen. They don't interfere with reading. It's one of the myths told by the "dead tree only" crowd. The others are: You can't dogear them. Well, you can, only you can also remove the dogear without leaving a trace, so that's actually a win in the ebook column. You can't mark them up. Again, you can and you can undo, but because the space is not limited to the page, you can add larger notes here than would be supported in print books, particularly those with thin margins. You can't use them if the battery dies. The battery lasts weeks for me and I'm a heavy reader. I have never found myself unable to use my Kindle because I was in some foresaken wasteland without access to power. I can even recharge my device for free on the bus if I have my cable with me (I usually do). I have found myself reading a book I lost interest in while out and about and using a Kindle (or any ereader), that's no issue. With print it used to be. You can't use it near water. This one is waterproof. I've never seen a print book that wasn't destroyed if you got it soaking wet. I'm not even sure where that myth came from. I can say my Paperwhite Signature fell into a sink full of water and didn't care. You retain more from print books. I'm putting this one in the myth column because I don't trust the methodology. First, they were only using iPads with notifications turned on. Then, when enough people cried, foul they used the Kindle DX (giant, wonderful device; I wish they'd revamp and reintroduce those). Only they only selected people who'd never used one before. I recently spoke to someone involved and we discussed why they didn't include audiobooks. Participants get 15 minutes to read about 25 pages. The print folk just get the book and start reading. The ebook folk get a lecture on how to use it before they start reading, but the lecture cuts into the 15 minutes. Ever wonder why the studies also show people on ebooks read faster? If they threw in audiobooks they'd have to allow enough time for participants to hear the story at normal speed. I want an apples to apples comparison, with people experienced with ebooks and identical reading times before I'll trust this. On a side note, if you want to remember what you read better regardless of medium, check out Moonwalking with Einstein (available on Kindle). One thing the "dead tree only" crowd won't talk about is the environmental impact. The impact of ebooks has always been better than that of print, but we've come so far in so little time, that a modern ereader like this one has the same impact as 14 print books. Once you read your 15th book on this, you net an environmental win. Another thing is accessibility. Any book can transform immediately into a large print book while remaining light and easy to hold and carry. Then there's lighting and the ability to read anywhere. I read in bed with the lights off. If you have a kid who "sneaks" a book under the cover, this makes it easier and reduces eye strain. Then there's the ability to text search for something you forgot and want to reference. I can barely stand print books for the inability to find some random tidbit easily. That and you get to keep your entire library. I'll always have nightmares about helping a little old lady who loves to read move into assisted living and having to discard the bulk of her library. The bulk of my library sits in my purse. And you can have the same book on multiple "shelves". That's how I get around the "is Star Wars science fiction or fantasy" debate. It lives in both. So for me, ebooks win overall, and if I have to go with one line, it's Kindle. Amongst the Kindle, my favorite is usually the Scribe for non-fiction (for the ability to take notes) and this for fiction (for the most comfortable form factor) with the base model being used in some situations.
Top critical review
62 people found this helpful
Something about battery life
By Daniel on Reviewed in the United States on March 5, 2024
The biggest features for me were 1 dark mode for evening reading (software feature) - A 2 blue light adjustments (software feature) - A 3 better font fidelity with 300x300 (software feature) - B 3a better touch intelligence preventing accidental page turns (software feature) - C 4 audio transcriptions (software feature) - F 5 manual/auto adjusting light (software/hardware feature) - A 6 larger screen - A 7 battery life - F Lesser features for me were 1 inductive charging - A 2 water resistant up to so many feet for so many hours - A 3 32gb storage - A Worst features (described over first paragraph) 1 pricing schema between the paperwhites - C 2 color options - C Unadvertised features 1 interface seemingly inspired by libby - A Apologies ahead of time for the wall of text but there is alot to cover. Why I chose the Signature edition versus the lower priced model is the horrible pricing schema for the paperwhite line. Yes, they are fifty dollars separate in price so I looked into why. First, the base model only has eight gigs of storage (a shocking amount for the price point). The normal kindle has twice the space and priced below a hundred dollars. So I started playing with the options. They don't specify, up front, that the base model is sponsored. Removing advertisements and the price increases by twenty dollars. Since the signature version doesn't have a sponsored version, this is the true price difference. Doubling the storage aligns it with the base model kindle and adds a colored rubber option for the plastic back plate - now a twenty dollars difference. I wanted the blue rubber, which they call denim (lol I mean come on). But whatever. At this point, it was more-or-less a simple decision. For a twenty dollar upgrade, you get double storage and inductive charging. Neither was a big selling point, but, it provided more bang for the buck. Eight gigabytes of storage equated to a ten dollar increase. Sixteen gigabytes is twenty. The inductive charging coil is a free throw in. I'll take it. At the end of the day, the books I read are all from the library. I haven't bought an ebook in years. I consider this an investment since I don't have to drive to the library for a pick up and return. I won't need to pay late fees (I'm horrible about timely returns and renewals). Reading is also far more enjoyable since I don't have the hand cramps from holding a paperback open. I can be in my dark living room because it turned nightfall as I read and simply adjusted the lighting on the device to keep reading. So, onto my review. Regarding the software features listed as 1, 2, 3(a), 4, 5, 6, 7 1. Dark mode was one of the strongest selling points. Even though it is a software driven feature, it's hard to pass up the extra comfort for evening reading. My tablets and home comupter are all dark themed for this reason. 2. The blue light adjustment is also a permanent setting for me. Blue light is literally destructive on the eyes and should ultimately be banished from all tech. At least, now, we can adjust the lighting. Big plus there. 3. Font fidelity is too good. Previous models had a lower font count resulting in an experience that felt more 'paper-like,' if you will. Fonts on paperback novels are low fidelity as they are, and the previous e-ink displays seemed more realistic. If a software patch lowered the font count for reading, I'd take it. 3a. The detection of false touches on the screen to prevent accidental page turns doesn't seem to work. In most cases, the header and footer of the reading interface pops up when accidently touching the screen. In this case, the page isn't turned, but it still changes the 'view' of the page requiring another tap to restore. If I hold it by the side bezel, a roll of the finger toward the edge of the screen will turn the page every time. This is really annoying. 4. Attempted audio transcription in the accessibility section. It's a bad feature. If you want it to read your book, it mispronounces many words and I'm thinking 'what did it just say?' Any slight touch on the screen will disrupt the reading, it'll state the word it thinks you touched, then nothing. It won't continue reading the book until you go back a page, then return. Then it begins reading from the top all over again. Aggravating. If you decide to use this feature while driving, stuff it in a glove compartment and don't look back. I can't even see how this could be a feature for blind users. The interface isn't meant for the visually challenged because it isn't very intuitive for those purposes. It's a smooth touchscreen with zero tactile feedback. 5. Manual light adjustment, naturally, is a great feature. They've had it ever since front lit displays were annouced. Fair enough. The autoadjustment, though, is aggravating. For me, I want no light if it's a bright room. And my eyes are unique to me, and the auto adjustment doesn't get it right. So, this feature is more fluff than anything. They could've saved three cents on the sensor and skipped the feature altogether. 6. Larger screen, is always good, enough said. 7. One selling point was the advertised battery life. Upon receiving the device, I put it straight on the charger for the initial fill up. Charged it to hundred-percent before activating it. As my usual routine with Kindle, i lowered the light to lowest setting and downloaded my reading list. Promptly turned airplane mode and proceeded to read. In the first twenty hours, the device was already at eighty-two percent battery. The time block included an eight hour sleeping period with the device in low-power mode. I may have spent three hours reading a book in this time period and the battery was already at ninety-two percent. At this rate, the device would need a charge in less than a week - far less than the 'up to ten weeks battery life.' This is now, more or less, a gimmick the way I see it. I'm sure ten-weeks means that the device is completely off and sitting on a shelf. As a comparison, my fifth-generation kindle paperwhite battery lasted at least six weeks when it was new and really only replaced it now because the battery lasts about thirty-six hours between charges. They also stopped pushing software updates years ago, god only knows why. The browser was still experimental and it struggled to display the kindle store as it was. The truth is, Amazon doesn't support their devices beyond three years, even with minor software releases. The platform should've improved on battery consumption. In reality, it's better than normal phone/tablets with battery performance, but not drastically so. Not like before. If I take this thing on my next vacation, the charger will be required. Regarding 1, 2, 3 1. I figured the inductive charging coil was more-or-less a gimmick. An ancient and ultra-inexpensive feature to implement on devices meant to provide marketing buzz in most cases. The truth is, this device will need to be charged FAR more often than advertised. And the wear and tear of the internal charging port would eventually lead to water infiltration if you read near a swimming pool, hot tub, the beach, or in the rain. 2. Leading to the water resistant 'feature.' I can picture a situations where a wife asks the husband 'honey, have you seen my kindle?' Husband responds 'yeah it's on the bottom of the pool.' This helps the community of users who stupidly bring their devices to the toilet and prone to dropping them into the waste water. God knows it's happened to me when checking my texts after a few cocktails. Yes I've been guilty of this in the past. And yes, I still bring my kindle into the bathroom to read while doing number two. 3. Storage, it is what it is. I don't consume many audio books, and this storage is really featured for that. Though, the storage is sufficient in holding large files. Large enough to store movie files. Regarding 1 1. The interface does seem inspired by the libby app. If I want to look at my 'send to kindle' web pages, then I can 'filter' the view on documents. I can 'filter' by the books I've only downloaded, and so on. I've grown accustomed to this view and it is welcome on the kindle. If I want to hit the brewery for a few pints, I'll spend ten minutes filtering through all my preferred new sites, i'll send to kindle the headlines that seem interesting, then take it with me. A distraction free device for reading news while drinking a few pints. This is nothing new but the filter feature makes it really nice.
Sort by:
Filter by:
Sorry, no reviews match your current selections.
Try clearing or changing some filters.Show all reviews
Show more reviews