ScreenBeam ECB6250K02 MoCA2.5 Network Adapter Starter Ki (Open Box)
$103.99
Condition: New; Open Box
Top positive review
3 people found this helpful
Wow!
By R. Rivera on Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2025
Wow. This freaking works!!!! I am using it with my Nest Wifi Pro mesh network with a router and 2 nodes. One of the nodes is on the 2nd floor and the router is on the 1st floor. Wifi on the 2nd floor is terrible. To the point that devices will intermittently disconnect from the wifi network. There are also spots on the 1st floor where the wifi has to penetrate multiple walls, which degrades the wifi signal to certain devices, like my son's PC. He is always complaining of terrible wifi. Anyways, fortunately for me, the house is pre-wired with coaxial cable for cable TV. Most of the rooms have a cable wall jack. So when researching home network solutions I came across ethernet over coaxial cable or MoCA. I took a chance that all the cable wall jacks were interconnected to service with the same cable TV provider, so this seemed like the ideal solution for me, So I can hardwire my son's and daughter's PC's to the router through ethernet over cable. I purchased the starter kit which comes with 2 cable/ethernet adapters, and also an additional adapter. Setting it up was pretty easy. I connected the first adapter to the Nest Wifi Pro router's ethernet port using the supplied ethernet cable, then connect one end of the coaxial cable to the adapter and the other end to the cable wall jack. Little did I know that this basically turned all the cable wall jacks into internet ready ports!!! Next I connected the 2nd adapter to the cable wall jack in the upstairs bedroom and then the ethernet to my daughter's PC and plugged in the power for the adapter. Voila!!!! The ethernet port lights on the computer light up! On my daughter's PC, we can see that it is connected to the ethernet. We turn off the wifi, then test the internet with Internet Speed Test. We have Spectrum with a 1GB download plan. Typically on wifi my daughter's PC will get about 100-150 Mbs download and a ping of 80 ms. Now we get 650 Mbs and 16 ms ping! IT WORKS!!!! So I do the same with my son's PC and he gets the same speed. Both kids are happy and life is good. Thank you ScreenBeam for making a wonderful product. Thank you MoCA for developing this awesome technology. Wow! I plan on buying another adapter to "hardwire" the Nest Wifi Pro node on the 2nd floor so that it is connected directly to the router. This is called a mesh backhaul. I haven't done it yet, but I am hoping this will solve the terrible wifi issues on the 2nd floor.
Top critical review
226 people found this helpful
WARNING: Device Failures and Refusal to Honor Warranty
By Toadcheese on Reviewed in the United States on August 9, 2023
Basic back ground. I am an IT professional, 24 years. The installation and configuration on a technical scale is childs play for me. I purchased 8 of these devices from November 2002 - April 2023 to install in my home network, despite having a robust WiFi mesh delivering 800+ link speeds to Ax devices. There are cases however, where I need to have physical connectivity since the 50+ endpoints in my network are not all Ax rated and the airspace is crowded. All Screenbeam MOCA devices initially worked as expected. As of June 2023, 5 of the devices now have defective Ethernet ports. Ethernet ports are a common failure point on routers, switches, and media conversion devices (like these). Bonding occurs as expected; however, Ethernet link activity and addressable network is non existent. That’s 5 failed devices out of 8. I requested an RMA under warranty through customer service. The response has been slow, but worse, the company customer service rep (unknowledgeable about IT networking 101) has asked for troubleshooting steps that are inconsistent with the issue. Also, have been instructed to perform time consuming phone calls with no clear understanding of the purpose other than to extend the support case. While understanding that I am allowing the company to proceed through their case management process to get an RMA (I get it, process), I performed the basic troubleshooting steps requested. Supplying results, I was told the devices were working as expected and asked to call customer service. This is a deliberate attempt to prevent or slow replacement - I know because I ran a consumer electronics call center long ago in my career (also the reason I left that job 15 years ago). This is ridiculous and a continued attempt not to issue the RMA and replace the devices under warranty. You can simple swap in a defective device to the topology, bonding occurs, and network traffic is non existent - no link activity on the port, no addressable network layer. Swap again with a good device and no issues. These devices have a 1 yr warranty. I share this experience so you can make your own judgements, but I cannot recommend these devices with high failure rates and when the company does not honor the warranty/RMA process. This is contractual. While most buyers/reviewers may purchase and never have an issue - providing 5 star reviews about the excitement that these devices “magically work”, I say proceed at your own risk. If these devices were $20-30 like a common desktop network switch, or 1-2 failed devices, I would just eat it and move on. But they are not. At $70 a pop, 5/8 device failures, we are venturing into material expense for a majority of people. I fundamentally do not accept this performance. I am moving on to competitor devices. Buyers be warned. Lastly - if Screenbeam customer service responds to this comment that they would like to “help me” - by directing me to call customer service, I say no thanks. Spare us the perception that your company is trying to resolve the issue when I already gave you that opportunity. Save me the intellectual dishonesty. The resolution is RMA. Period. The resolution is not to stay on the phone wasting my time teaching your low level techs basic networking and your continued assertion that the devices are working and the issue is my “other equipment”, WAN provider, or a coax splitter that isn’t present in the network topology. Comical.
Sort by:
Filter by:
Sorry, no reviews match your current selections.
Try clearing or changing some filters.Show all reviews
Show more reviews