radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
Just be aware that, each time they are charged, they PERMANENTLY lose a fair percentage of their capacity (5%??) which mounts up until they are useless.
This stuff was marketed more then ten years ago by the "big brands" and failed in the market.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.
Wookee
quality posts: 1
Private Messages
I bought the earlier deal of four batteries and a four-position charger and have enjoyed both the batteries and the charger.
My experience with rechargeable AA batteries has taught me that there are good and bad batteries and no way to tell them apart short of using them. I've bought several brands and have not been able to find any consistency. I am still using some of the first batteries I bought, and I have thrown several away. Most of the bad ones do fine for a few charges, then quickly degrade. Others start leaking voltage on the shelf quickly, requiring them to be recharged after only a week or so. The good ones are solid.
The four that I have of the iGo brand have held up well so far and the charger does a good job of charging the other brands I've tried in it (Energizer and Duracell).
I mostly use the batteries in electronics that eat through batteries quickly, including wireless keyboards, game controllers, and to a lesser extent, wireless mice, but as I find the good batteries, I use them in low-drain devices as well, like flashlights and my electric toothbrush.
Since I bought another Woot, I'll bite on this set this time, even though I don't need the AAAs.
First sucker: Wookee
Speed to first woot: 0m 25.210s
Wooter to blame for sellout: Wookee
Sellout time: 8:12:40 AM Central Time
Order pace: 0m 25.210s
Total woots: 1
Wookee
quality posts: 1
Private Messages
radi0j0hn wrote:Just be aware that, each time they are charged, they PERMANENTLY lose a fair percentage of their capacity (5%??) which mounts up until they are useless.
This stuff was marketed more then ten years ago by the "big brands" and failed in the market.
I'd be interested in seeing where you heard about the 5% statement. I've not had the same experience consistently.
You are right that a similar technology was tried a while ago, but the tech didn't fail, the consumers did. Rechargeable alkalines were phased off the market when the battery companies saw a huge rate of "defect" returns coming from users recharging them in the then-common NiCd rechargers, which charge completely differently (with very little regulation) than rechargeable alkalines or NiMH.
At the time, I used both kinds of rechargeables for different uses and their different characteristics. I did mix up the chargers once. Only once.
First sucker: Wookee
Speed to first woot: 0m 25.210s
Wooter to blame for sellout: Wookee
Sellout time: 8:12:40 AM Central Time
Order pace: 0m 25.210s
Total woots: 1
radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
olamoree wrote:Yeah, the DIMENSIONS of the batteries and even in Metric like AA and AAA don't define them. SO, then What Is the CAPACITY? A miserable 400 mAh or something greak like 2800 mAh? NO MORE secrets, plz.
Please read my earlier post about the decreasing capacity after each charge cycle.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.
radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
Wookee wrote:I'd be interested in seeing where you heard about the 5% statement. I've not had the same experience consistently.
You are right that a similar technology was tried a while ago, but the tech didn't fail, the consumers did. Rechargeable alkalines were phased off the market when the battery companies saw a huge rate of "defect" returns coming from users recharging them in the then-common NiCd rechargers, which charge completely differently (with very little regulation) than rechargeable alkalines or NiMH.
At the time, I used both kinds of rechargeables for different uses and their different characteristics. I did mix up the chargers once. Only once.
That (user stupidity) could certainly be one reason for the marketing failure. But my figures are from memory and based on the info from the PR company that sent me a set for review. It was years ago, and the exact amount of capacity loss may be wrong. But the fact is that NiMh came on strong and this tech was relegated to the dustbin. Why it is back now is a mystery to me.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.
radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
thesilverring wrote:Your sennheiser charger broke the batteries. It blatantly says in the instructions do not use in other chargers.
Other rechargables (NiCD,NiMH ...) operate at 1.2V per cell, these operate at about 1.6V. Putting them into a 1.2V charger will cause problems - you found that out the hard way by ignoring the instructions.
I hope your kit wasn't damaged.
Anyway, these batteries work well in most places - but not in any kit that charges itself!
I have about 30 of them.
Also, the losing 5% capacity per charge comment someone made is bogus. That is how much residual charge they lose per year (maybe a month, I forget) when left on the shelf.
The charger door coming off. The first thing I did was pull it off an throw it away anyway, beats me why it is there in the first place..
This is a good buy people!
My comment was not bogus. It was based on the press release from the PR company at the time I reviewed them nationally on radio. I could be wrong on the 5%, it might be 3%, but it still remains that after about 25 charges, they hold so little power they are useless. That is ONE reason why they were dropped by major name brands; they are just not that good. Ever see any in stores? No. There is a reason.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.