radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
Secunza wrote:Anyone knows about the shutter lag in this camera?
I really hate when I have the perfect moment in front of me but my actual camera decides to take a break and make the shot when the moment is long gone.
It's getting better, but if you need that kind of speed, buy a DSLR. You get what you pay for.
You can press the shutter button half-way to lock in focus and exposure and then complete the press to take the shot, and that may help. But to expect a cheap camera to power up, focus, set exposure and fire the shutter instantly is simply not realistic at this early stage of digital camera technology. (We are still in the early years of these cameras. Imagine what cars were like when they were 12 years into production!)
Also, this class of camera is not meant for high speed bursts, low light gym sport shots and other situations in marginal lighting.
Learn about the relationship between f/stops and shutters speeds and ISOs to better understand the complexity of taking good photos.
There is no magic fairy dust camera that does everything for you perfectly in this price range at this time. Maybe in a few years.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.
radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
steviethev03 wrote:So, I already have a pretty nice Canon 50D, but have been looking for something in the point and shoot size.
Sometimes the 50D is just too big to bring along. I need something that's going to take pretty decent pictures in those scenarios when I need something small. Like a birthday party. Or a bike ride. Or to the beach. You know, places that you may want to have a camera, but don't want to lug a big DSLR along.
Is this going to work for me?
I understand the quality, and perhaps the colors won't be as good, but that's what Photoshop is for anyway.
I will say, that it would be nice to have a point and shoot that took good enough pictures so that I can just have them printed without any editing.
Thoughts?
The scenes you are mentioning are pretty much what this class of camera was designed for! I think the only thing you will miss is there is no optical viewfinder. It's harder to compose an (outdoor) shot when you can't see the screen due to harsh sunlight. But, heck, it's a 90 buck camera.
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.
radi0j0hn
quality posts: 78
Private Messages
It's time to start thinking of these cameras as a good temporary investment for a couple of years. That's only $45 a year to use it, then get some next generation that is even better.
With the rapid pace of improvement, I'm not sure a current $600 compact camera is a great investment.
If you are doing just standard shooting, this camera will be just fine. It's only the gym/action/low light types who need to invest more.
You'll spend more than this on chips and salsa in the next two years.
Eventually, camera progress may level off, but right now we are still in the early years. Buy something, shoot pictures, and enjoy!
acpress.com Not cute, but useful.